高级检索

    基于附着盘量化与分子证据的高鳞车轮虫群体分化研究

    POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION OF TRICHODINA HYPSILEPIS WELLBORN, 1967 BASED ON THE CHARACTERISTICS QUANTIZATION OF ADHESIVE DISC AND MOLECULAR EVIDENCE

    • 摘要: 本研究结合量化形态学与分子生物学方法, 对采自我国6个地区(重庆、四川、广西、湖北、贵州、广东)5种宿主花鲈(Lateolabrax japonicus)、泥鳅(Misgurnus anguillicaudatus)、大鳞副泥鳅(Paramisgurnus dabryanus)、鲢(Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)、斑马鱼(Danio rerio)来源的高鳞车轮虫(Trichodina hypsilepis Wellborn, 1967)进行了种内群体分化研究。基于不同维度的量化形态学比较结果显示: (1)按地理_宿主组合群体分析, 广西_花鲈种群在多数形态学核心指标上极显著高于其他种群(P<0.001), 湖北_斑马鱼种群则极显著低于其他种群(P<0.001), 二者分别构成了形态极端群体; 重庆_花鲈种群整体低于广西_花鲈种群, 但仍显著高于其余中间型群体(P<0.05); 此外, 不同地区的泥鳅群体、贵州_鲢种群及四川_大鳞副泥鳅种群在大多数指标上差异不显著(P>0.05)。(2)按地理群体分析, 广西种群与湖北种群分别为形态最大与最小群体, 重庆、贵州、四川和广东种群为中间型群体。(3)按宿主群体分析, 花鲈种群与斑马鱼种群分别为形态最大与最小群体, 鲢、泥鳅及大鳞副泥鳅种群为中间型群体。三种不同维度的主成分分析(PCA)结果基本一致, 即高鳞车轮虫大部分群体相互重叠、少数群体呈分离分布, 表明该虫种存在不同程度的种内群体形态分化。进一步的主效应分析表明, 宿主因素对附着盘形态分化的主效应虽强于地理因素, 但二者更可能表现为协同作用。综合分子研究结果显示, 高鳞车轮虫各群体间已出现不同程度的遗传分化, 湖北_斑马鱼种群是高鳞车轮虫中较早分化的群体, 同时形成了较高的形态与遗传分化, 但尚未达到独立成种的水平; 对于形态尚未明显分化的泥鳅类来源的群体, 已在基因层面出现了不同程度的遗传分化。综上, 本研究基于形态学、分子生物学及宿主证据共同验证了高鳞车轮虫的物种有效性。

       

      Abstract: This study combined quantitative morphological and molecular methods to investigate intraspecific differentiation of Trichodina hypsilepis Wellborn, 1967 collected from six geographic regions (Chongqing, Sichuan, Guangxi, Hubei, Guizhou, and Guangdong) and five host species (Lateolabrax japonicus, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, Paramisgurnus dabryanus, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, and Danio rerio) in China. Multi-dimensional quantitative morphological comparisons revealed the following: (1) Analysis based on geographic region_host combination showed that the GX_LJ population exhibited significantly higher values than other populations in most core morphological indices (P<0.001), while the HB_DR population showed significantly lower values (P<0.001), representing the two morphological extremes. The CQ_LJ population was generally lower than the GX_LJ population, but remained significantly larger than the intermediate groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were found among MA populations from different regions, the GZ_HM, or the SC_PD population (P>0.05). (2) By geographic region, the GX and HB populations were identified as the morphologically largest and smallest groups, respectively, while the CQ, GZ, SC, and GD populations were intermediate. (3) By host species, the LJ and DR populations represented the morphologically largest and smallest groups, respectively, with the HM, MA, and PD populations being intermediate. The results of principal component analysis (PCA) from three different dimensions were generally consistent: most populations of T. hypsilepis overlapped with each other, while a few showed a separate distribution, indicating varying degrees of intraspecific morphological differentiation among populations of this species. Further main effect analysis showed that the host factor had a stronger main effect on the morphological differentiation of the adhesive disc than the geographical factor, but the two factors tended to act synergistically. Consistent with molecular findings, varying degrees of genetic differentiation have occurred among populations of T. hypsilepis. The HB_DR population represents an early diverging group within this species, exhibiting notable morphological and genetic differentiation, yet it has not reached the level of independent speciation. For populations derived from loaches (MA and PD population) that have not shown obvious morphological differentiation, varying degrees of genetic differentiation have already occurred at the genetic level. In summary, based on the morphological, molecular, and host evidence, the present study has validated the species validity of T. hypsilepis, a taxon that has been controversial in taxonomic history.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回